Home
The "Best Of" blogspace of NiƱa Terol


Rediscovering Eros

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

“Eros does not exist!”

So exclaimed a friend of mine over e-mail. I was shocked. She was a beautiful, intelligent, and passionate fashionista with a cause who had access to many of life’s gifts and who probably held the key to many men’s hearts—how could she say that Eros does not exist??

She was seconded by good friend of ours—an award-winning poet, playwright, filmmaker, and creative genius who, in the pursuit of his One Muse here on Earth, has awoken all the other muses of the heavens and has probably swept them off their wings and into the harem of his mind.

I was shattered. How could my friends—these amazingly talented and passionate individuals—no longer believe in magic, in passion, in destiny, in all these wonderful things that make love maddening yet sobering, that make life chaotic yet serene? How could they turn their backs on the madness and embrace a life that is staid, bland, and… dead?

* * * * *

When I was much younger, I refused to believe in the concept of One Love, of that One Soul from whom our souls were separated and with whom we must reunite if we were to experience Real Love. I was cynical probably because I was the product of a broken marriage, and because I never saw in my parents an image of love that was acceptable to my sensibilities. For me, then, love was the product of attraction, commitment, devotion, dedication, and a lot of hard work. You didn’t just experience love; you had to earn it. (And maybe my parent’s just didn’t work hard enough.)

During my freshman year in college, a friend of mine asked me which I preferred: a man whom I loved, or a man who loved me. I chose the latter, and I reasoned that anyone can learn to love anyone else—what matters is that the man loves the woman more than she loves him. (Where on earth I got that idea, I don’t know…)

I couldn’t have been more wrong.

My previous relationship was with someone who really, really, honest-to-goodness loved me (or so I thought). He wasn’t the guy on my wish list, but he just cared for me so much that it became easy for me to imagine that, maybe, I could learn to really love him back. He seemed to be the quintessential boy-next-door whom you could bring home to Mom, and so I did, trying to convince myself that he could be the guy for me. After four years of waiting for Certainty to turn up, however, I realized that I couldn’t be with someone whom I didn’t love as much as he loved me.

You could stone me now for being such a bitch, but one of the things that told him when I said goodbye was that he was “the perfect little black dress that every girl sees from the store window and wants to bring home”, but that I realized that “that perfect little black dress just doesn’t fit me well”.

You really shouldn’t just settle for someone when you know how much more you can give with someone else.

* * * * *

My relationship with Paul made me believe in Eros again. Our reunion was the product of a long string of coincidences and, in his words, “cosmic accidents” that were too intense and too real to be humanly contrived. We bumped into each other again, after seven years of neither seeing nor hearing from each other, at the right time and under the right circumstances; and we just knew from that first meeting-again that something was going to happen that would change our lives in ways we couldn’t even begin to imagine.

We thought that it was already “freaky” that we shared the same birthday, that our fathers have the same first name, that our mothers were colleagues and friends during their PAL days, that we grew up in the same area, and that some of our friends and relatives moved in similar circles and were closely connected. What we didn’t see yet back then was that more things would happen to us in the next two years that will bind us even closer to each other, in ways that only God Himself could have orchestrated.

A few nights ago, as we were driving home from a party, we were talking about relationships, and about what brought people together and what drove them apart. We discussed other relationships that we were privy to, and we agreed that you shouldn’t stay in a relationship that doesn’t feel deeply, organically right. You had to feel the certainty in every pore of your body, and this certainty had to come from and go right through your core. Otherwise, you’d be stuck in a shallow and lifeless relationship—and who would want that?

As we were approaching home, I just had to ask the question that every girl is probably dying to ask her boyfriend, in the context of our conversation: “So, what about us?”

“What do you mean, ‘what about us’?”

“Do you think we have what it takes… to, you know… go the full stretch?” (Of course, I had to sugarcoat my question.)

I was expecting him to sigh, take a few seconds or so to think, and maybe even say that he wasn’t sure. (He's a guy, after all.) But his response was as matter-of-factly for him as it was surprising for me.

“Nines, I think we both know by now that we are intrinsically linked.”

I couldn’t help but smile.

* * * * *

“Intrinsically linked.”

There goes the idea of Socrates’ erotic love again—of one soul that was split into half and that goes through life searching for the Other. The idea that each person, each soul has a corresponding Other, and that there is someone made just for somebody else.

(At least I think it could be attributed to Socrates, but I’m not really sure.)

It’s funny because I feel it with Paul—I know that what we have is too real to dispute—but I still can’t bring myself to understand it. If there is exactly one person for everyone else in this world, then how do you explain all the failed relationships around us? Is it because people have been too impatient, and have settled for other partners, therefore barring themselves from meeting their True Soulmate? And, since there are now more women than men all over the world, does it mean that homosexuality is truly acceptable? (Of course, Socrates and his young pupils would certainly think so.)

And what if you don’t ever find The One? What happens then?

It’s a scary thought—going through life alone, or going through life without someone whom you truly, deeply, passionately love. Maybe that’s why so many of us are in a mad scramble to commit ourselves to someone even at the risk of being stuck with “the wrong person”. Life is too perplexing and exhilarating at the same time to go through on your own.

But, then again, who can blame us? Finding “the right person” is such a tricky deal—and it’s often the product of chance or pure luck—that you’d really rather put yourself in a safe and secure place, than go out there and risk coming back with nothing.

However, I am reminded of another good friend of mine—someone who has already recognized her One True Love and who is not willing to settle for anything less—who told me once: “Life is already filled with so much mediocrity, and love shouldn’t be one of them.”

She’s right. If Eros means seeking for the truest, deepest, most perfect kind of love of which we are capable; if it means knowing what’s Real and what’s Right and fighting for the right to have it; if True Love means never giving up until we’ve found our home in the Other, then I think we owe it to ourselves to live it.

 

(Written: May 2005)

Posted by ninaterol at 2:08 pm | permalink | Add comment

There Is Hope After All

"There is only one thing that I'm going to ask of you," the young woman, a nursing student from Davao, said to the young man in front of her. "If possible, please let killing be your last, last, LAST resort."

The young man, a cadet from the Philippine Military Academy (PMA), looked up. His eyes said that he wanted to respond, but he chose to remain silent and listen instead.

The nursing student continued, "In my hometown, Christians and Muslims live together in peace. Even the military and NPA (New People's Army, a group of revolutionaries with communist ideals, whom the military is mandated to eliminate) live together peacefully. Please," her eyes shone with tears as she begged, "tell your superiors and everyone else in the military to stop the killing. There is no war."

Another young lady, a Muslim student from Marawi, spoke up. "I agree with her," came the assertive tone. "Do you know that, in our place, Christians and Muslims live together without any conflict? Sometimes it's the government who initiates the war, and then the peace is broken again." She goes on to relate that, one day, she and her family chanced upon a group of soldiers firing cannons up at the sky. When asked why the cannons were being fired, these military men laughed and said that they were just using up their extra supplies!

"But what goes up must come down!" The young Muslim cried. "What will happen if those cannons hit the innocent civilians living on the ground? Sorry na lang sila?"

"The problem with the military is that they send you guys off to Mindanao after graduation even without knowing what the situation there is," the nursing student continued empathically in her Hiligaynon-accented English. "If you only immersed yourselves in the area–as civilians, and not as military men–before you are brought there, then you would know what the real situation is."

"There is no war," she reiterated.

Finally, the young cadet spoke. "I don't know why those men were firing cannons up at the sky… But I do know that, sometimes, we make everyone else believe that there is no war, that the situation is under control, and that there is peace. We do not want civilians to live in fear of their lives. We want life for them to go on as normally as possible."

He continued, "Guys, this may be the last time that we will get to see each other. Who knows? I may die right after graduation–just like what happened to one of my upperclassmen who was sent to Mindanao shortly after he graduated… So let me tell you this: I will do my very best to keep the peace in this country so that you, Duchess (referring to the nursing student), can conduct your medical missions anywhere in the country; and that you, Kirby (referring to another young man in the group), can continue to work for the environment, and so that all of you can do what you are supposed to do.

"None of us will be able to achieve our goals in a country that doesn't have peace."

Exchanges like this are rare in this country–and many such discussions end in word wars (and even real wars) that seem to have been sparked by the pettiest things. Many of us are brought up to be fearful of what we don't know and of what we don't understand. When I was much younger, my yaya (nanny) would always threaten me with this every time I misbehaved: "Sige, i-baligya kita sa mga Moro! (I'll sell you to the Muslims!)" That was enough for me to shut up, tone down, and develop a fear of the big, bad Moro. Little did I know that, many years later, I would be enamored by the colors, costumes, and culture of the Filipino Muslims.

There's so much that we don't know, and even less that we understand. This is why it's important for us to open ourselves up and allow new information, new insights, and new experiences to enter our lives. At the recently concluded Ayala Young Leaders Congress (AYLC)–which is by far the most rigorous and prestigious annual search for the country's top student leaders–I saw how four days of interaction, learning, reflection, and open and honest discussion changed the lives of 71 of the country's emerging leaders. They were all student leaders, all big fish in their little ponds. They all came to the Congress with big dreams and somewhat big egos–after being filtered by the Congress' rigorous screening process, who wouldn't?–but they all left with an understanding that nobody has the monopoly over virtue, wisdom, wealth, or influence. Everyone is here for a reason, and we are all faced with the challenge to find common ground and build a single vision that's powerful enough to propel all of us to positive, productive action.

I've attended five AYLCs already–once as a delegate in 1999, and four times as a facilitator–and what was strikingly different about this Congress was that there was a sincere effort among all the delegates to acknowledge their differences and celebrate their diversity. It was because they were different that they were strong. Each person brought to the group his or her own strengths, talents, skills, and experiences; and it is through all of these that they will be able to contribute to a concerted and sustained effort to move the country forward. Whether they become soldiers, priests, farmers, professors, corporate executives, or artists doesn't matter. What matters is that they believe in the power of the Filipino.

At the unofficial closing ceremony of the Congress, AYLC 2005 created an oath that signified their commitment to stay united in spite of their diverse interests and to make a difference in their spheres of influence wherever they were. They recited this oath in different Filipino languages–Maranao, Bicolano, Pampango, Hiligaynon, Bisaya, Ilocano, Tagalog–each time cheering for their provinces and for their mother tongues. As I watched the delegates proudly owning and proclaiming their "Filipino-ness", I felt teary-eyed and immensely hopeful, thankful that young people today have a venue to learn more about each other and dispel their fears of the unknown. I am confident that a few years down the road, we will wake up to a freer, enlightened, and (perhaps) more prosperous society.

There is hope, after all.

Posted by ninaterol at 1:31 pm | permalink | Add comment

The Smallness and Greatness of Things (part 2)

Life is in the details.

I had been trying, for weeks now, to write a suitable sequel to my war and heroism piece, but I somehow couldn’t bring myself to complete my drafts. I had started writing about Bruce Lee, and how his brand of martial arts and movie-making revolutionized martial arts and martial arts films as we know them, and how they ushered in a new era of advocacy and entertainment that, in my view, has yet to be eclipsed—at least in this side of the world. But beyond gushing about his films, the philosophy behind them, and the detail with which he planned and choreographed his scenes (especially the famous pagoda scene in Game of Death), I couldn’t find anything else to say that would connect it to my piece on Fahrenheit 9/11. Not that it was supposed to, but I wanted it to.

Details, details, details.

Then I watched Shattered Glass, a movie about a rather high-profile—and young—writer whose soaring career was struck down by an investigation that dug deep into his reporting style and writing process (I don’t want to give too much away), and I realized that, indeed, much of my work is dependent on details and on the manner in which I manage them. Indeed, in the fast-paced and unsettling world of journalism, all it takes to bring you down is one misquote, one unverified fact, or one unreliable source. You don’t want one silly detail like that to ruin your career, but it very often does.

It’s a large world out there, and there’s a big picture to which we ought to contribute, but I don’t think it can be done without sufficient attention to details.

* * * * *


My brother just came home from his retreat the other night, and so he spent last night collating all the letters and notes that he had received in his small scrapbook. He showed me a few, and that sent me on a letter-reading frenzy of my own.

I wanted to impress him by how well I collect letters, so I dug out some of the oldest from my “treasure box”, dated October 8, 1990. My brother was just almost a year old then, and we both giggled at the realization that my first retreat was held 14 years ago!

It was surreal, to say the least, seeing nice words and messages from names I barely recognize anymore! One retreat letter even called me Mrs. ____, an allusion to my crush du jour—whom I had also forgotten about—and told me that I “act like a lady but don’t look like one”, and maybe that’s why my crush didn’t pay me any attention. I tried to figure out what that meant, and then realized that it must have been because I was outright fat that my classmate thought I didn’t look too much like a “lady”. (Take a look at me now, dearie, and tell me what you think! Hahaha…)

As I read more letters and went further up the dateline, details of my past came rushing back as if a dam had been broken. Most of the letters and notes from my high school days—and there were a lot, I tell you!—referred to me as “Mrs. Blanch”, a reference, of course, to my first boyfriend Brian. Pick out any letter from the high school pile, and chances are you’ll find a line that goes, “How’s Brian?” or Brian this, Brian that. And, of course, I found the letters that Brian wrote me as well—including one that addressed me as “Terol”. It was such a laugh trip.

The letters that touched me most, though, were from people I barely remember now—people whom I never thought cared, but who actually did. (And I made a mental note to locate them all on Friendster!) There was one little note from a classmate of mine from second year high school, Kiv Tejada, that was supposed to be a “belated happy retreat” note. He was apologizing for not having written to me, and so on, and he ended the note by saying, “stay cute because I love you.” I was taken aback by those last words. Kiv had always made fun of me in class, and he used to pester me with jokes and silly notes and what-not, and it surprised me that he felt enough about me to write “I love you.” Sadly, Kiv passed away in a car accident early this year, and so he’s one person I’ll never be find on Friendster.

That note is now tacked on my corkboard as a reminder of how short life is, and how our words—no matter how short or seemingly insignificant—can really hurt or heal other people. Kiv’s “I love you” struck me as warm and reassuring, because he had never “made the moves” on me, nor attempted to be more than friends. I guess he just felt that he needed to say it, and he did.

* * * * *


Paul and I are not an “I love you” couple. That is, we don’t salt and pepper our conversations with “I love you”, as if it were some punctuation that had to be added at the end of each parting, phone call, or what-not. That unsettled me at the beginning of our relationship because I had gotten used to boyfriends who said “I love you” in every possible occasion, and who would feel bad if I didn’t say it back before putting the phone down. It was only in this relationship when I felt the real power of those words, and I realized that “I love you” is not something we should take lightly. It’s not something we use to make us look cute or charming, or to eventually get our way, or to appease our partner when they’re feeling bad about something.

“I love you” brings with it some pretty heavy responsibilities, regardless of the kind of relationship we’re in, and we should be ready for those when we say the words.

However, we should also be sensitive enough to know when those words are being meant even when they’re not being said.

I remember one really intense conversation that Paul and I had. We were talking about where we were in our lives, what we meant to each other, and so on, and I admitted feeling that I was more in love with him than he was with me. He asked me why I felt that way, and I said it was because he never said “I love you” enough.

Then he turned to me with a look that showed a lot of sadness and hurt. He had been saying “I love you”—every single day, in the littlest of his actions, in the smallest of sacrifices, in the softest of words. But I was too wrapped up in my own ideas of how love should be expressed, and so I took all those little expressions of devotion as meaningless.

“And all you needed to know that was a letter from me,” he sighed.

* * * * *


Ironically, Paul’s first note to me said anything but I love you.

I was looking through my college pile, seeing a lot of letters from my roommate and “sister”, Gen, my college sweetheart, Mach, and a host of other people from my student council days, when a little note found its way in my hands. I opened it, and I was stunned to see the Batman insignia hastily drawn at the bottom of the page. Ohmigod. Paul! (I didn’t realize that we were close enough to write each other notes back then!)

Then I laughed out loud upon reading his note, which was about the girl that he pursued through most of his college days. He was writing about her, and about how good it was to have spoken to her again, even just for a while… but he was writing to me. I didn’t even know that I knew about her back then, and I honestly don’t remember us having been close enough to have talked about these things. But we apparently had been rather tight, and something about our friendship apparently already struck him by then, for Paul to have written me about her.

“You always think that life has no more surprises for (you) and then… you’re surprised,” he wrote.

Well, sweetie, eight years later, and look at us now. Life’s little surprises.

(Written: August 25-26, 2004)

Posted by ninaterol at 1:23 pm | permalink | Add comment

Creating "Us Moments"

I was awakened at midnight by a light tapping on my window. Knowing that only one person had the habit of showing up at my doorstep at the oddest hours, I jumped up and hurried my unadorned little self out the door. I still had some leftover eyeliner on my eyelids, dark circles under my eyes, and just-got-out-of-bed hair, but the only thing I was thinking of at that time was, "How long had I kept him waiting outside the door?"

I opened the door excitedly, not really knowing what to expect from this man of many surprises, but nobody was there. A car was parked right smack in the middle of my driveway, however, and that told me that Paul was just hiding somewhere, waiting for me to step out. And so I stepped out of the door, bare feet and all, and after a few seconds of me calling out his name, Paul stepped out from behind his car with a large smile and a warm, Valentine's Day kiss.

He had been waiting outside our village gate for quite a while already, he said, but he wanted to surprise me by knocking on my door at exactly midnight today. It was only the first of his many Valentine's Day surprises for me, and it amazed me that this guy could still think of all these little things after all this time. The courtship had ended a long time ago, but the romance definitely hadn't.Ü

I am one lucky girl.

* * * * *

We were also lucky enough to get a very crisp DVD copy of Shall We Dance, which–of course–we had been reserving for today. As I watched Richard Gere sashay down the dance floor, tears flowing from my eyes, I thought about all the things that happen to us everyday that keep us from keeping the romance in our relationships alive. Work, meetings, chores, domestic matters, family squabbles, petty arguments, issues large and small… These all fill up our days and hardly leave any space for us to create intimate moments with our loved ones. So no matter how much time we spend with our beloved, and no matter how much money we blow on expensive gifts for each other, we still sometimes feel a loneliness that could only be cured by real "us moments"–moments when nothing else really matters except you and the life you have created together.

It often takes special occasions, such as today (Valentine's Day), for us to remember to carve out some time for those "us moments". But why not create "us moments" everyday? Like John Clark, Richard Gere's character in Shall We Dance, we shouldn't hesitate to dress up nicely and ask our beloved to dance (literally or figuratively) anytime, anywhere. After all, we never really know what tomorrow will bring. We shouldn't wait for the perfect opportunity to do something romantic, for that "perfect opportunity" may never arrive.

Ultimately, it's up to us to create magical moments in our lives. They can happen anytime, anywhere–whether you're loaded or broke, whether you have a minute or a week. Love changes in form and expression, but Romance should always be part of any love relationship.

For if you don't keep the romance alive and take your beloved dancing (literally or figurately), somebody else might.Ü

Happy heart day, everyone! Welcome to another year of Spoonful of Sugar.

Posted by ninaterol at 1:22 pm | permalink | Add comment

The Smallness and Greatness of Things (part 1)

I used to think of movies as sources of entertainment, things that I should pay attention to only when I have enough free time to actually sit still, focus on just one thing, and not fall asleep. In recent months, however, I have come to regard movies as chapters of "required-reading" books, lessons that I have to learn in order to become a better artist, social activist, and individual. It was because of this newfound mindset that I have been on the lookout for art films, foreign language films, rare classics, and even anime. Because of this, I now schedule my TV and movie viewing as I would any other business activity.

In the past few weeks, I was fortunate enough to have viewed these "required-reading" chapters one after the other, as if the lesson were of such magnitude that it really had to drill itself through my head. Two weekends ago, the chapter was on war and heroism, with such titles as To Be or Not To Be (a Mel Brooks classic), Uncle Saddam, Fahrenheit 9/11, Troy, and Spiderman 2 leaping out from among the list of cable and DVD movie titles.

At the end of it all, I realized that they were all speaking to me about just one thing.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

* * * * *

 
In To Be or Not To Be, funnyman Mel Brooks is a Jewish-Polish thespian struggling with the demands of his art and his illusions of greatness in the midst of the Holocaust. By some strange twist of fate, he finds himself face-to-face with the Gestapo on several occasions, using his theatrical skills to fool the idiots into thinking that he is both a Polish informant and Die Führer, Adolf Hitler. He successfully averts the execution of the Poles through a series of well-executed plots and theatrical ruses, giving his best performance away from the spotlight and without an audience.

Uncle Saddam, on the other hand, exposes the atrocities of the Hussein regime in Iraq in an ironic, almost comical fashion—intersplicing footage of actual interviews with the dictator and news clips of his activities, with humorous commentaries from both allies and critics. It shows how the incredibly vain Saddam Hussein perpetuated a self-serving, self-inflating regime that benefited close friends and family members, vanquished detractors and foes, and ultimately held millions of Iraqis hostage. The human rights violations shown in this film would have been enough justification for the world to take the old man down, without the United States piping in and claiming a questionable Al Qaeda connection.

And now, on to the United States. Michael Moore’s controversial and award-winning Fahrenheit 9/11 shows how, in the eight months of the Bush presidency before the September 11, 2001 attacks, George W. Bush "spent 42 percent of the time on vacation", whether he was playing golf, fishing, hanging out at his Texas ranch, or posing for photo ops. It shows how the U.S. could have braced itself for the terrorist attacks had the president been doing his job, and how—more importantly—the Bush administration concealed the connections between Osama Bin Laden/Al Qaeda and Saudi businessmen who were closely linked to the Bush family. Ultimately, Saddam Hussein (the asshole that he is) should not have been the target of those large-scale counter-terrorist attacks that killed thousands of Americans and Iraqis, and benefited a handful of American businesses (most, if not all, of them with a Bush/Cheney connection).

Troy and Spiderman 2, I suppose, need no introduction.

* * * * *

 
Watching these films made me wonder even more about how war—any war—could be justified. It made me realize that, taken in their proper context, some seeming acts of greatness (such as taking down an Iraqi dictator who is "endangering the whole world" with his "weapons of mass destruction") are actually just selfish, self-serving actions done to cover up the foibles of men and nations in positions of great power and influence; while small, selfless acts without sound bites of photo ops (such as sacrificing one’s dreams and loved ones to the call of duty) are the deeds of which real heroism is made.

Through these films, I have seen how human beings, in an effort to communicate or perpetuate their greatness (such as in Saddam Hussein’s case), are reduced to small, selfish creatures with limited vision and myopic interests. Or, the reverse: to cover up shameful deeds that reduce great leaders to small-minded bigots (such as in Paris’ or George W. Bush’s cases), they fabricate great stories and causes that others would be willing to die for, invoking such timeless (and otherwise vague) ideals as justice, freedom, and security to gain sympathy and support.

Meanwhile, the "little people", those who wish for nothing more than to have their basic needs and to live rather comfortably, are thrown—by their sense of civic duty and responsibility—in the midst of war, to support their leaders (these great men) in their fight for justice, freedom, and security. These "little people" are not in positions of power or influence; it was not their decision to fight these battles and conquer these enemies. But they know that it takes more than one man to topple an unjust regime, or to save the lives of others in danger, so they willingly give up their own needs and comforts so that others may have theirs.

Peter Parker, without his Spidey suit, is just a normal kid who’s trying so hard to make ends meet by juggling a job, a freelance job, and school. In trying to help others (and thus do "great" and noble deeds), he is made more acutely aware of his smallness, his limitations. (For how can one man save the world, do his job, and ace his exams at the same time?) Mr. Bronsky (Mel Brooks’ character in To Be or Not To Be) fumbles onstage when performing his self-acclaimed piece, "Highlights from Hamlet", but gives the greatest performance of his life away from the audience and the applause. The American soldiers who have gone to Iraq know that it is their duty to serve their country, and so they leave their homes and their families to do a thankless job that will ultimately cost them their lives, in a war that will ultimately benefit a handful of men who couldn’t care less.

War brings out the greatness of being small, and the smallness of being great. It turns great leaders into cowards, and ordinary men into heroes.

Not all wars, of course, but these ones that I’ve somehow witnessed, at least.

So what end does war really achieve, and how can it really be justified? More importantly, what does it really mean to fight a war, and what does it really take to be a hero?

Will we ever really know?
 
(Written: July 25, 2004)

Posted by ninaterol at 1:19 pm | permalink | Add comment